翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Village of Dreams ・ Village of East Davenport ・ Village of Edgewood Historic District ・ Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. ・ Village of Four Seasons ・ Village of Four Seasons, Missouri ・ Village of Greenwich Historic District ・ Village of Idiots ・ Village of La Jolla ・ Village of Lisle-Benedictine University Sports Complex ・ Village of Martinsville ・ Village of Merrick Park ・ Village of Monroe Historic District ・ Village of Morattico Historic District ・ Village of Oak Creek, Arizona ・ Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment ・ Village of Secrets ・ Village of the Arts ・ Village of the Branch Historic District ・ Village of the Branch, New York ・ Village of the Damned ・ Village of the Damned (1960 film) ・ Village of the Damned (1995 film) ・ Village of the Giants ・ Village of the Pharoahs ・ Village on the Green, New Jersey ・ Village on Venetian Bay ・ Village on Wheels ・ Village otaman ・ Village Pakhar Hill Town Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment ： ウィキペディア英語版 Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment ''Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment'' was a case before the United States Supreme Court. ==Background== A nonprofit environmental-protection organization was denied permission to solicit contributions, pursuant to a village ordinance prohibiting the door-to-door or solicitation of contributions by charitable organizations not using at least 75 percent of their receipts for "charitable purposes". This requirement exclude administrative expenses such as solicitation expenses, salaries, and overhead; thus, if more than 25 percent of the nonprofit's revenue was used to pay salaries, then it could not prove that it used at least 75 percent of its revenue for the organization's charitable purposes. The organization sued the village in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the ordinance's 75-percent requirement violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Court, awarding summary judgment to the organization on the ground that the 75-percent requirement was a form of censorship prohibited by the First and Fourteenth Amendments, declared the ordinance void on its face, enjoined its enforcement, and ordered the municipality to issue a charitable solicitation permit to the organization. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed, holding that although the 75-percent requirement might be valid as applied to other types of charitable solicitation, the requirement was unreasonable on its face because it barred solicitation by advocacy-oriented organizations even where it was made clear that the contributions would be used for the reasonable salaries of those who would gather and disseminate information relevant to the organization's purpose (590 F2d 220). 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.